Monday, December 04, 2006

gettin' head on mars

The above 4-way split screen image says a lot about this evidence. Of what portion we can see of it, this object looks incredibly very much like an anatomically correct humanoid skull or perhaps a humanoid statue head sticking out of the ground staring sightlessly upward from its dark empty eye sockets and its general position suggests an unseen body laying on its back under the ground. Note the anatomically general size and shape, the forehead, the empty socket dark eye holes, the bone bridge between the eye holes, the nose projection, and the beginnings of one side of the mouth. Information just not to be ignored.

However, for me, what makes this even more reportable as anomalous evidence even more than its general look is the fluffy image tampering applications clustered around the base of the object. This darker bulky obscuring area isn't rocks and/or shadow as one might at first presume, it is image tampering giving it this false bulky look in those spots. To be able to see this image tampering texture better is why I've included the lower right fourth split screen lightened image. Note the diffuse fluffy fuzzy quality that are these darker tampering areas. This is typical of false artificially added information as compared to real solid particulate surfaces like the real ground level bone (skull) or artificially worked statue head material that are of course as hard surfaces much more solar light reflective. For me, it is these image tampering applications partially obscuring this object that gives much more credence to this being something someone did not want us to be able to adequately recognize.

So why not just hide the whole thing? I suspect that is often the case with the most critical geometric and linear shaped evidence so suggestive of artificiality where all is hidden under obliterating applications. I suspect great multitudes of anomalous and very real visual information has been successfully hidden in this way and we may never know how much. Likewise, I suspect that great multitudes of perfectly normal natural geology have also been needlessly hidden because it may have demonstrated a little too much geometric or linear geometry suggestive of artificiality that the imperfect software is programmed to recognize and not like.

However, more irregular shaped objects and angles are another matter and it is apparently not so easy for the automatic tampering software's programming to recognize this kind of material as objectionable and a possible candidate for its tampering applications. For example, there is my Report #073 titled "Animal Fossil Skulls on Mars" where the animal fossil skull evidence has no tampering on it at all. The tampering software clearly doesn't see such animal evidence as different than other normal rocks in the terrain. On the other hand, what may be true of animal fossil evidence and what may be true of humanoid skull evidence could be two very different matters.

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2006/102/mars-humanoid-skull.htm

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home